메이저 바카라사이트

□ Case summary

ㅇA report was filed against a medium-sized construction (the “constructor”) in relation to an allegation that 메이저 바카라사이트 had unfairly reduced subcontracting cost and had failed to make the outstanding payment, thereby violating the Subcontracting Act.

□ Decision

ㅇThe Korean Fair Trade Commission decided to release 메이저 바카라사이트 from suspicion and to end the relevant investigation procedure.

- Unfair reduction of subcontracting cost: The alleged unfair reduction of subcontracting cost did not constitute an act violating the Subcontracting Act, and therefore, 메이저 바카라사이트 had no suspicion pursuant to Articles 47(1) and 53-2(1) of the Case Procedural Rules.

- Failure to make the outstanding subcontracting payment: Since it was impossible to determine whether 메이저 바카라사이트 had violated the applicable law due to the differences in the two parties’ argument and the difficulties in confirming factual background, it was decided that the inspection procedure be ended pursuant to Articles 46.1, 46.4 and 53-2(1) of the Case Procedural Rules.

□ Barun Law’s role and implications

ㅇThere is a risk of being judged under the text or practical execution of the Subcontracting Act to be in violation of the Subcontracting Act if the subcontracting price is adjusted or partially withheld.

ㅇIn particular, although there is an agreement on the adjustment of subcontract payments between 메이저 바카라사이트 and the subcontractor due to poor site management, construction suspension, defects, etc., constructors are frequently found that they have violated the Subcontracting Act as subcontractors change the attitude towards an agreement made with the constructors regarding the adjustment of subcontracting payments,

ㅇRepresenting 메이저 바카라사이트, Barun Law argued and substantiated that the subcontracting payment had been reasonably adjusted as follows:

①메이저 바카라사이트 had paid for labor cost and material cost on behalf of the subcontractor as complaints had been filed due to the subcontractor’s failure to pay labor cost, and construction work had been suspended;

②There had been accidents, including death at the construction site due to the 메이저 바카라사이트’s poor site management;

③메이저 바카라사이트 had conducted substitute construction work due to the subcontractor’s suspension of construction work, and there had been an agreement made between the two parties to resolve the issue; and

④메이저 바카라사이트 had paid reconstruction cost incurred by defects for vendors, and had filed a civil lawsuit against the subcontractor for damages.

The Korean Fair Trade Commission accepted most of Barun Law’s arguments and decided that 메이저 바카라사이트 had no suspicion and the inspection procedure be ended.