해외 바카라 사이트

①Who did Barun Law (attorneys Kim Yong-kyun, Park Yoon-jeong and Lee Jong-hwa) represent? Barun Law represented certain regular workers and contract-based workers of a state-owned corporation engaging in transportation business.

②Case background: The corporation had dismissed the workers on the ground, “According to the investigation conducted as part of special inspection to identify employment related irregularities of public agencies and organizations, it was found out that certain persons who had a close relationship with the workers had solicited the chief of the labor union of the corporation to hire certain candidates, which constitutes an event justifying for the corporation to dismiss the workers, who had been hired according to the solicitation, ex-officio under the established internal labor regulations (i.e., an event in which the employer discovered that the workers were disqualified of employment or that the workers had been employed in a fraudulent or unfair manner).”

③Litigation: Representing the workers, Barun Law filed a lawsuit to confirm the nullification of the ex-officio 해외 바카라 사이트 of the workers against the corporation and argued, “The persons closely related to the workers had never made the alleged request for employment, and even if it is assumed that the persons made such requests, according to the rules of employment established by the corporation, it would be a reasonable interpretation that the workers can be dismissed ex-officio only when a causal relationship between the alleged irregularities and the employment exists. However, there is no causal relationship between the alleged act of solicitation and the workers’ employment.”

On November 19, 2020, the 4^{해외 바카라 사이트} Civil Division of the Seoul Central District Court accepted all the claims made by the workers, determining, “The court recognizes that the persons closely related to the workers requested the chief of the corporation’s labor union for employment. However, this court cannot accept the corporation’s assertions because the assertions are contrary to the interpretation of the rules of employment. In addition, it is hard for this court to see that the request for employment made to the labor union chief was delivered to managers in charge of employment. It is insufficient for this court to accept that there was a causal relationship between the request for employment and the workers’ employment. There is no evidence on the basis of which this court can admit that there was such causal relationship.”

Based on abundant experience of dealing with lawsuits for unfair 해외 바카라 사이트 and confirmation of nullification of ex-officio 해외 바카라 사이트, Barun Law pointed out and substantiated illegality of the ex-officio 해외 바카라 사이트 made by the corporation against the workers through a thorough analysis and the citation of the existence of an act of soliciting employment, the limitation of the interpretation of the corporation’s rules of employment in light of the Supreme Court of Korea’s interpretation of rules of employment, theories regarding fixed-term workers transferred to an indefinite-term, and related criminal judgements and records.

It is reasonable to assume that an applicant who will benefit from certain irregularities is also a person engaging in the irregularities even in the case where a third party closely related to the applicant conducts irregularities for the applicant. However, where the rules of employment (or labor management rules) require a causal relationship between irregularities and employment in dealing with matters regarding ex-officio 해외 바카라 사이트, where there is no causal relationship found out between actual solicitation and employment, the existence of an elicit request for employment cannot be a reason for an employer to dismiss the relevant worker ex-officio.