바카라추천

1. Case summary

□ 바카라추천 is a company with business objectives of manufacturing and selling car parts. The plaintiffs are subcontractors who executed a contract with 바카라추천.

□ The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit for damages of about KRW3.6 billion, alleging that they suffered damage due to 바카라추천’s acts of violating (i) the ban on reduction of contract payments, (ii) the ban on determining an unfair contract payment and (iii) the obligation to pay fees for note discount and note payment and 바카라추천 was liable for three folds of the damaged amount under the Subcontracting Act.


2. The court’s decision: Recommendation of a compromise, in which 바카라추천 should pay KRW245 million to the plaintiffs

□ The court made the decision of recommendation of conciliation, ordering 바카라추천 to pay KRW245 million, which is far less than the amount 바카라추천 admitted it was liable for the plaintiffs. The decision was finally entered as the parties did not make any objection.


3. Our support

□ We actively expressed the opinion that the plaintiffs had failed to sufficiently substantiate the alleged damage amount (specifically, the portion exceeding the amount found by the Korean Fair Trade Commission as violation of the Subcontracting Act). (In particular, we pointed out that the plaintiffs did not properly prove the normal price in the case of the ban on determining an unfair contract payment.) 바카라추천 was subject to the order to correct and pay surcharges by the Korean Fair Trade Commission for the violation of the Subcontracting Act. We aggressively argued that penalty (i.e., the KFTC’s action against the violation of the Subcontracting Act) could not be compatible with the concept of punitive damages imposed in lieu of penalty. Consequently, we helped 바카라추천 obtain the favorable decision of recommendation of conciliation.


ㅁ Attorneys in charge: Baek Kwang-hyun and Kim Ji-su