안전한 바카라 사이트

1. Case summary

▷ 안전한 바카라 사이트 (specifically, attorneys Ko Il-kwang and Kim Yong-woo) represented a chief monk and auditor of a foundation (“Mr. B”).

 

▷ 안전한 바카라 사이트. B who is a chief monk and auditor of a foundation (“Foundation A”) was accused of falsifying documents in the name of Foundation A and submitting the falsified documents to public offices without a resolution of the board of directors or general meeting of Foundation A and spending money deposited into the account of Foundations A for construction cost while he kept the account.

 

▷ After judging that 안전한 바카라 사이트. B engaged in falsifying the private documents in the name of Foundation A and stealing money from Foundation A, the police sent the case to the prosecution, expressing the opinion of prosecution against him. We were involved in the case for 안전한 바카라 사이트. B from the prosecution stage.

 

▷ Accepting our opinions, the prosecution decided not to prosecute 안전한 바카라 사이트. B for all the allegations.

 

2. Our defense and role

 

▷ We argued that even if 안전한 바카라 사이트. B was found that he had executed construction related documents in the name of Foundation A without a resolution of the board of directors or general meeting thereof, since he was in charge of administrating the properties of Foundation A, there would be a room for the documents to be legally void or cancelled, but the execution of such documents by 안전한 바카라 사이트. B could not directly link to his criminal intent to falsify the documents.

 

▷ We also strongly argued that it could be found that Foundation A had not paid 안전한 바카라 사이트. B compensation for his service but permitted him to use properties of the temple for his living expense, in light of the tenor of the Supreme Court of Korea’s Decision 99Do4699, and that it would be difficult to say that 안전한 바카라 사이트. B used money in breach of his duty as chief monk even though he had spent without taking a due procedure, in light of the establishment process, property management and operation practices of the temple concerned.


3. Implication

 

▶ In general, executing an important document or spending a significant amount of money without taking a procedure to obtain a resolution at the board of directors or general meeting of a foundation is likely to constitute the falsification of a private document and embezzlement.

 

▶ However, as confirmed by the Supreme Court of Korea’s Decision 99Do4699, the chief monk has been in charge of the management of properties for Foundation A without receiving compensation for his service and there has been no issue with spending money without taking such procedures. Therefore, the decision of this case is meaningful in that it confirms that if there are such special circumstances as found in the precedent above, the allegations of falsification of private documents and embezzlement could not be found.

□ Attorneys in charge: Ko Il-kwang, Kim Yong-woo